© 2017 Southwest Pennsylvania Environmental Health Project The authors would like to correct errors to the paper that were introduced during the publishing process. Table 1 was published incorrectly, with some numbers missing. Detailed captions were also omitted for the two Figures, Figure 1 and Figure 2. Please find the corrected version of Table 1 and the complete Figure captions included in this Corrigendum: Figure captions: Fig. 1: Variation in total sitting time between worksites n = 214 Time spent in total sitting at work in each worksite relative to average sitting across all of the sites (dotted line: 6.3 h/8-h at work – unadjusted; 6.5 h/8-h at work-unadjusted). Unadjusted data represents Best Linear Unbiased Predictions (BLUPs) fo...
A corrigendum on: The Associations of Dyadic Coping and Relationship Satisfaction Vary between and ...
Correction: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 20: 53 (2023)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01453-x Follow...
The authors regret that in the above article a misprint appears in table two presenting the evidence...
This is a corrigendum for the article: Office workers' objectively assessed total and prolonged sitt...
The authors regret errors were present in the published article. Counts of some of the adverse event...
© 2017, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. In the original publication, the direction of the respons...
When this paper was first published, there were errors in Figure 1 and Table 3. These errors have no...
The authors regret errors were present in the published article. Counts of some of the adverse event...
[This corrects the article on p. 878 in vol. 7, PMID: 27378978.]. There was a mistake in the Interv...
The authors regret incorrect titles of Figures 3 and 4. The authors would like to apologise for any ...
Refers to: “Stationarity of health expenditures and GDP: Evidence frompanel unit root tests with het...
I N the above paper [1], the following corrections are noted.Fig. 1 has an error in section numberin...
The authors regret that on page 68, Table 3, the number of observed cases, the PAR, and the attribut...
© 2020 Sports Medicine Australia The authors would like to highlight an error in their article, as b...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in the Table2. The data under...
A corrigendum on: The Associations of Dyadic Coping and Relationship Satisfaction Vary between and ...
Correction: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 20: 53 (2023)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01453-x Follow...
The authors regret that in the above article a misprint appears in table two presenting the evidence...
This is a corrigendum for the article: Office workers' objectively assessed total and prolonged sitt...
The authors regret errors were present in the published article. Counts of some of the adverse event...
© 2017, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. In the original publication, the direction of the respons...
When this paper was first published, there were errors in Figure 1 and Table 3. These errors have no...
The authors regret errors were present in the published article. Counts of some of the adverse event...
[This corrects the article on p. 878 in vol. 7, PMID: 27378978.]. There was a mistake in the Interv...
The authors regret incorrect titles of Figures 3 and 4. The authors would like to apologise for any ...
Refers to: “Stationarity of health expenditures and GDP: Evidence frompanel unit root tests with het...
I N the above paper [1], the following corrections are noted.Fig. 1 has an error in section numberin...
The authors regret that on page 68, Table 3, the number of observed cases, the PAR, and the attribut...
© 2020 Sports Medicine Australia The authors would like to highlight an error in their article, as b...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in the Table2. The data under...
A corrigendum on: The Associations of Dyadic Coping and Relationship Satisfaction Vary between and ...
Correction: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 20: 53 (2023)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01453-x Follow...
The authors regret that in the above article a misprint appears in table two presenting the evidence...